Documented Results
Measured in the Field
Water Flow Management performance varies by building, system and application. The following examples summarize results contained in historical field reports and customer documentation supplied to RMEG.
Case 01 · Multifamily / HOA
Pier 33 Condominiums
19%+
reported reduction in initial meter measurements
The condominium association subsequently reported water and sewer savings exceeding $3,000 per month and a device payback of less than two months.
The customer also reported no noticeable change in water pressure.
Pier 33 Condominiums
Mooresville, North Carolina
Case 02 · Multifamily / HOA
Managed Residential Community
21.43%
reported water-bill savings over six months
A 204-home community managed by PS Property Management reported average monthly water bills declining from approximately $21,500 to $17,000 after installation.
The customer reported more than $20,000 in savings during the first six months and approximately a four-month payback on the investment.
PS Property Management
Texas
Case 03 · Commercial / Irrigation
Duke Energy Facility
22.73%
difference measured during the documented controlled test
A field engineering report compared a 15-minute irrigation-system test before and after installation. The report recorded, for the stated test conditions:
- 81.4 gallons — pre-installation
- 62.9 gallons — post-installation
Duke Energy Building
Charlotte, North Carolina
Results are application-specific. Actual savings and payback vary based on water use, system conditions, application, utility rates and sewer-billing structure. Historical case results are not guarantees of future performance.